9 posts tagged “peace”
The price of greatness is responsibility. If the people of the United States had continued in a mediocre station, struggling with the wilderness, absorbed in their own affairs, and a factor of no consequence in the movement of the world, they might have remained forgotten and undisturbed beyond their protecting oceans: but one cannot rise to be in many ways the leading community in the civilized world without being involved in its problems, without being convulsed by its agonies and inspired by its causes.
If this has been proved in the past, as it has been, it will become indisputable in the future. The people of the United States cannot escape world responsibility. Although we live in a period so tumultuous that little can be predicted, we may be quite sure that this process will be intensified with every forward step the United States make in wealth and in power. Not only are the responsibilities of this great Republic growing, but the world over which they range is itself contracting in relation to our powers of locomotion at a positively alarming rate.
We have learned to fly. What prodigious changes are involved in that new accomplishment! Man has parted company with his trusty friend the horse and has sailed into the azure with the eagles. Where, then, are those broad oceans, those vast staring deserts? They are shrinking beneath our very eyes. Even elderly Parliamentarians like myself are forced to acquire a high degree of mobility.
But to the youth of America, I say "You cannot stop." There is no halting-place at this point. We have now reached a stage in the journey where there can be no pause. We must go on. It must be world anarchy or world order.
Law, language, literature - these are considerable factors. Common conceptions of what is right and decent, a marked regard for fair play, especially to the weak and poor, a stern sentiment of impartial justice, and above all the love of personal freedom, or as Kipling put it:"Leave to live by no man 5 leave underneath the law" - these are common conceptions on both-sides of the ocean among the English-speaking peoples. We hold to these conceptions as strongly as you do.
We do not war primarily with races as such. Tyranny is our foe, whatever trappings or disguise it wears, whatever language it speaks, be it external or internal, we must forever be on our guard, ever mobilized, ever vigilant, always ready to spring at its throat. In all this, we march together. Not only do we march and strive shoulder to shoulder at this moment under the fire of the enemy on the fields of war or in the air, but also in those realms of thought which are consecrated to the rights and the dignity of man.
If we are together nothing is impossible. If we are divided all will fail.I therefore preach continually the doctrine of the fraternal association of our people, not for any purpose of gaining invidious material advantages for either of them, not for territorial aggrandizement or the vain pomp of earthly domination, but for the sake of service to mankind and for the honor that comes to those who faithfully serve great causes.
Here let me say how proud we ought to be, young and old alike, to live in this tremendous, thrilling, formative epoch in the human story, and how fortunate it was for the world that when these great trials came upon it there was a generation that terror could not conquer and brutal violence could not enslave. Let all who are here remember, as the words of the hymn we have just sung suggest, let all of us who are here remember that we are on the stage of history, and that whatever our station may be, and whatever part we have to play, great or small, our conduct is liable to be scrutinized not only by history but by our own descendants.
Let us rise to the full level of our duty and of our opportunity, and let us thank God for the spiritual rewards He has granted for all forms of valiant and faithful service.
To learn who spoke these timeless ideals and read the full speech click here.
Remember the message of the anti-war and peace activist crowd as we committed ourselves to ousting Saddam Hussein?
Has war been declared under a cloak of conspiracy? Has America's huge appetite for oil driven it to war for the oil in that country and to protect the value of the American dollar? Has President Bush cherry picked a country and a regime to fight because he thought a war president can't be questioned? Has America started WWIII? Was the US lying about Weapons of Mass Destruction so it could take control of Iraq's oil? Was President Bush taking his religion to the extreme to drive Christianity into the Middle East? Was he trying to set up the New World Order his father spoke about when he was president? Was President Bush's motive to recharge the American war industry and get those weapons factories back into big government contracts? Was he trying to set up a military state in the US to gain militant control and therefore establish a permanent position as the leader for the US? Is anybody still saying the war in Iraq is a total disaster, a mess, a catastrophe and that its not going to get any better, that its only going to get worse? Given a chance to see the war prosecuted and work some real progress, we can now start pointing to the evidence of what the evil nation building Bush regime intended to do in Iraq and Afghanistan. We are not stealing the Iraqi's oil and we are not setting up a puppet government. We are working with the indigenous people to establish law and order and drive out the criminal elements of terror and intimidation. We are rebuilding the infrastructure better than we found it. We are creating an environment where people can choose their own rule of law and write their own constitution and live in a community of agreed upon standards of behavior rather than either the oppressive regime that was toppled or the rogue powers that would fill its vacancy.
Buying a better tomorrow: CLB-6 dispersing, CAG use money as a weapon in Haditha Triad
From the local to the regional level, Shives believes the combined effort of the CAG teams and CLB-6 dispersing is paying off throughout his AOR. It’s a change especially felt by the Iraqi citizens.
“A year and a half ago, I was afraid to do business and had to move away from my home,” said Achmad Nasir, the head of the Haditha business association. “Now, more and more businesses are coming back to Haditha and bringing work to the community. I feel secure in my home and my city.”
“I think working with the CAGs is the best part of what I do,” said Cpl. Eric McClure, a pay agent with CLB-6 dispersing. “I feel like I help these projects reach fruition, which will lead to a successful end for us and the Iraqi people.”
This is us in their countries. Now let's have a look at Muslim controlled countries as they have developed naturally from the war clans of Mohammad's design, and a look at them in our countries.http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,360925,00.html
A young blind boy has died after a teacher at his Islamic school in Pakistan hung him upside down and beat him for not learning the Koran, Agence France-Presse reported Friday.
Teacher Qari Ziauddin allegedly hung Muhammad Atif, 7, from a ceiling fan at Qari Latif Islamic school near Lahore, Pakistan, on Thursday.
Pakistani Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani has ordered an investigation into the boy’s death, AFP reported.
"The Prime Minister has expressed his deep sorrow and concern over the tragic death of Muhammad Atif, who reportedly died as a result of corporal punishment by his teacher,'' an official government statement said.
Pakistani police said Ziauddin has been arrested and charged in Atif’s murder. The police also report Ziauddin did not take the boy to the hospital after his condition deteriorated following the beating.
Local police official Akram Niazi told AFP an autopsy report confirmed that physical torture caused Atif’s death.
"Qari Ziauddin hanged Atif upside down with a ceiling fan in the school after beating him with sticks, which caused his death,'' Niazi told AFP.
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/010608dnmetfunerals.216ceab.html
Their Christian funeral service Saturday – followed by a Muslim service later in the day – served as a reminder of the promise their short lives held and the needless tragedy of their deaths. Police believe they were killed by their father, a 50-year-old cabdriver.
And the police presence was a reminder that the girls' Egyptian-born father, Yaser Abdel Said, is still on the run.
Amina, 18, and Sarah Yaser Said, 17, who both attended Lewisville High School, were found shot to death in a taxi at an Irving motel Tuesday night.
http://www.nysun.com/national/islamic-groups-named-in-hamas-funding-case/55778/
A list of co-conspirators was released in connection with the federal trial in 2005 of a former college professor, Sami Al-Arian, on terrorism support charges. However, when Enron executives went on trial last year, the list of alleged co-conspirators was kept under seal. Prosecutors on the Holy Land Foundation case could not be reached yesterday and did not respond to an e-mail.
The inclusion of the Islamic groups on the list of alleged conspirators could give ammunition to critics of the organizations. CAIR, in particular, has faced persistent claims that it is soft on terrorism. Critics note that several former CAIR officials have been convicted or deported after being charged with fraud, embargo violations, or aiding terrorist training. Spokesmen for the group have also raised eyebrows for offering generic denunciations of terrorism but refusing to condemn by name specific Islamic terrorist groups such as Hamas or Hezbollah.
In addition, one of the Holy Land Foundation defendants, Ghassan Elashi, founded CAIR's Texas chapter. CAIR's Washington office was also set up in 1994 with $5,000 in seed money from the foundation, according to congressional testimony by a researcher into Islamic extremism, Steven Emerson.
Our military actions around the world over the past century have nearly always been with the intention of bringing help to the oppressed, food to the hungry, human rights to the abused, protection to the threatened, and hope to the downtrodden but we have been described as anything but a force for good by the Left of this generation. War dissenters lie. They called President Bush a liar which is a twist on the definition of a lie in the first place. They lied about America's motives. They lied about America's goals. They lie about our efforts. They lie about our accomplishments. They lie about our abuses. They lie about our methods. They lie about our troops' behavior. They lie about our history. They lie about how we get into wars. They revisit history in our schools and media. I refuse to believe mainstream news media anymore unless I can get independent verification through neutral or opposing sources. I approach reputable organizations' studies and reports with suspicion. There is no honesty in American and indeed world discussion of politics, ethics, values, or America's role in world leadership within the academic, political, economic, or even theological circles of intellectuals. It is a rare voice that is not so set in his beliefs that he will consider arguments from the opposition. Integrity and honesty in the discussion is required to heal the division in our own culture and politics. That's why I call on everybody to judge right.
Excerpts from a newsletter from ACT for America by Clair M. Lopez
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.189,css.print/pub_detail.asp
http://www.actforamerica.org/
Our government is responsible for keeping us safe from threats foreign and domestic. Somehow they have taken the notion that identifying our enemies by name is somehow, not in our best interest. I for one believe we must identify the enemy so that we can 1. accurately strategize to defeat them 2. recognize their goals, tactics, and patterns 3. call on the rest of the Muslim world to correct their behavior 4. mobilize our people to the necessary work at hand. I know the basic direction the three holy texts of Islam all support war against the unbeliever but as a Christian I also know that the Bible has passages that have been used in the past to propagate war against unbelievers. Given that Christianity has corrected its own and is now interpreted to instill peaceful means to a peaceful end I hold out a trace of hope for Islam to reform. However, as demonstrated by my last post, Islam is not patient with critics be they Muslim or anything else. I have, therefore come to the conclusion that until Islam learns how to self correct, all other governing systems must correct them as one coalition force until Islam repents of its aggressive nature.
[The refusal of DNI McConnell and, apparently, the rest of the Bush administration, to acknowledge the obvious linkage between terror in the name of Islam, and the Islamic faith, goes beyond absurd: it is dangerous to national security because it prevents the U.S.'s top officials from crafting an appropriate strategic policy to defend us. Willful ignorance of the fundamental doctrine of Islamic Jihad, as defined by Islamic scriptures, scholarly consensus, and historians cannot change what is written, what is believed, and what is lived by those who would destroy our Constitutional system and replace it with Sharia. It doesn't matter in the end whether we agree or disagree with the doctrine of our enemies, or judge it good or evil: if that is what guides the enemy's behavior towards us, then that is what we must deal with. It is also irrelevant that more peaceful methods for propagating Islam, such as Da'wa, do exist, or that there indeed is a "Greater Jihad" (the inner struggle to better oneself). Neither Da'wa nor the "Greater Jihad" employs warfare or terror to replace liberal democracy with Sharia. But the "Lesser Jihad" does.]
This paragraph denotes an important conclusion about our own behavior. No matter what Islam is saying about their behavior, changing it is not happening. We have to deal with what is, not what we wish it was, and not with what some Muslims wish it was. What it is is violent and dangerous and intends involuntary submission by all non-Muslim and many Muslim factions.
[This is Islamic law;
this is sacred, non-abrogated, Islamic scripture. It is doctrine. It
cannot be changed. It can be criticized or renounced - but if Muslims
do so, they are apostates, subject to the death penalty. It will take
much courage and the support of free people everywhere to establish the
right to leave such doctrine behind, in the dustbin of history.]
There are factions in the West who want to see Islam wiped out whatever it takes. I am not on that crusade, but I am practical enough to know that jihadi Muslims are not turned from their violent ways by discussion or appeasement. This will require an overwhelming force prepared to do the greatest amount of violence in the shortest amount of time to the factions who openly state their intentions, and with greater caution those who covertly act and teach this violent doctrine. Not every Muslim is desirous of Sharia being steamrolled over other cultures and I would hold back using military forces to drive them out or have them convert from their faith, but they must understand that suspicion is cast upon them by the factions of Islam they would not or could not correct themselves.
[Outreach to non-jihadi
Muslims is certainly a key component of this war. But we need to show
them and all who believe in the values of tolerance and civil society
the respect they deserve. A misplaced concern that holds such potential
allies incapable of distinguishing between the Greater and Lesser Jihad
and thinks an infantilized lexicon that denies the reality we all see
will somehow win over hearts and minds betrays an incompetence that is
jarring to observe. Neither can fear of the magnitude of this threat be
allowed to destroy our faith in ourselves, our abilities, and our
values. Dhimmitude (the second-class status of people conquered by Jihad)
is a status freely accepted; it does not happen overnight, but is
slipped slowly, inexorably over a society that loses its will to resist.] We have to get serious about the immediacy of this threat to Western culture and civilization when our nature and values have allowed them to infiltrate our highest institutions of learning, culture, legislation/litigation, and every industry of interest to their radical cause. 'especially when they have nation states that have acquired technology which if employed could destroy entire nations in the space of one surprise attack. 'and especially when leaders of these nations speak vehemently to cheering crowds of thousands that they will destroy the Western rule and enforce Sharia all over the globe. 'and finally, especially when a virulent faction has gained control of a nation and is racing along the technological path to nuclear capability while proclaiming that they would destroy another nation even if it meant the destruction of their own nation. [We Americans are not a people to submit, whether by infiltration, subversion, or Jihad.]
Looking for clues
But because Obama is relatively new on the national political scene, and new to foreign policy questions such as the long-simmering Israeli-Palestinian conflict, both sides have been looking closely for clues to what role he would play in that dispute.
And both sides, on certain issues, have interpreted Obama's remarks as supporting their point of view.
Last year, for example, Obama was quoted saying that "nobody's suffering more than the Palestinian people." The candidate later said the remark had been taken out of context, and that he meant that the Palestinians were suffering "from the failure of the Palestinian leadership [in Gaza] to recognize Israel" and to renounce violence.
Jewish leaders were satisfied with Obama's explanation, but some Palestinian leaders, including Ibish, took the original quotation as a sign of the candidate's empathy for their plight.
From the LA Times.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-na-obamamideast10apr10,1,2280318.story
Obama is a practiced politician but he is not a practiced foreign affairs manager. The Israelis have always taken hope where it is not secured and then doubt the alliance of real friends. It is amazing how many times they have chased after popular policy makers like adolescent girls chasing the charm and lure of the promises of adolescent boys only to be disappointed time and again, but when it comes to trusting the hand offered in cautious optimism, they have required much greater shmoozing to begin to trust.
Obama's alliances with past and present terrorists and criminals has little effect of casting doubt on Israelis' hopes for support as they accept the minimal excuses for his statements appealing to the Palestinian hopes for condemnation of Israel's self defensive actions. I am biased, I know I am biased, and I freely admit I am biased. This is not the case of the Main Stream Media. They claim to be fair and balanced but their works do not reflect their claims. Al Jezeera is biased, and they know they are biased and in some cases admit they are biased, but they also claim they are fair. Any casual glance at al Jezeera's work clearly reveals they are not fair and have no interest in being fair.
So, why do the Israelis believe in politicians like Barak Obama? I have a theory, but I'd like to hear yours.
|
| Home | Get Involved | Donate | Chapter Information | Contact Congress | Issues and Legislation | News |
|
Dear JudgeBob, As predictable as the sun coming up in the East, a spokesman for an Islamic organization has condemned Congresswoman Sue Myrick’s “Ten Point Plan” to wake up America to the threat of Islamic terrorism. Just as predictably, the “condemnation” makes no attempt to refute the plan or make a factual case against it. The reason, as so aptly pointed out below, is that the Muslim spokesman cannot refute the plan. Thus, the “condemnation” consists of the same tired, worn-out, name calling and ad hominem attacks that are standard fare for Islamic apologists. It’s an age-old propaganda technique – if you can’t refute the message, try to destroy the messenger. We should be encouraged by this lame attempt to smear an honorable Congresswoman. It should motivate us to work even harder to spread the truth about Islamofascism far and wide! The more people see the truth, the more they will recognize that those who try to defend militant Islam have nothing to offer except, well, fear-mongering and name-calling. Shock horror: Muslim leader condemns Myrick anti-jihad plan! http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/020830.php "'Myrick's latest attempt at fighting terrorism is nothing more than a fear campaign,' said Jibril Hough, a spokesman for the Islamic Center of Charlotte. 'It is nothing more than a new McCarthyism, or Myrickism. As Muslims, we have become expendable as politicians like Myrick seek political gain.' "Myrick said she wants the group to give a point-by-point rebuttal of her plan." Yes, that would be most interesting. What could Jibril Hough say? Let's go through the Myrick Plan and see: 1. Investigate all military chaplains endorsed by Abdurahman Alamoudi, who was imprisoned for funding a terrorist organization. Alamoudi is doing 23 years for funding jihad terrorism. Is it possible that some of the military chaplains he endorsed shared his jihadist views? Can Jibril Hough explain why not? 2. Investigate all prison chaplains endorsed by Alamoudi. Same question as for #1. 3. Investigate the selection process of Arabic translators working for the Pentagon and the FBI. An FBI whistleblower has reported that Arabic translators there cheered the 9/11 attacks. Can Jibril Hough explain why this should not be a cause for concern? 4. Examine the non-profit status of the Council on American-Islamic Relations. The Council on American-Islamic Relations has had several of its officials convicted on jihad terror-related charges, and was named an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas funding case. Can Jibril Hough explain why its tax-exempt status should not at least be examined? 5. Make it an act of sedition or solicitation of treason to preach or publish materials that call for the deaths of Americans. Objections, Mr. Hough? 6. Audit sovereign wealth funds in the United States. If these funds may be used to conduct warfare against the U.S., what exactly is Mr. Hough's objection? 7. Cancel scholarship student visa program with Saudi Arabia until they reform their text books, which she claims preach hatred and violence against non-Muslims. It is demonstrably true that they do. Does Mr. Hough endorse this? 8. Restrict religious visas for imams who come from countries that don't allow reciprocal visits by non-Muslim clergy. This is simply in the interests of mutual tolerance and understanding, is it not, Mr. Hough? 9. Cancel contracts to train Saudi police and security in U.S. counterterrorism tactics. Given ongoing Saudi financing of the global jihad, what exactly is Mr. Hough's objection? 10. Block the sale of sensitive military munitions to Saudi Arabia. Same question as #9. But I doubt that Hough will provide a point-by-point refutation, for the same reason that John Esposito will not debate me. What can they say? "Muslim condemns Myrick plan: Senator says she welcomes dialogue on anti-terrorism proposal," by Jim Morrill for the Charlotte Observer (thanks to Twostellas):
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACT for America
P.O. Box 6884 Virginia Beach, VA 23456 www.actforamerica.org ACT for America is an issues advocacy organization dedicated to effectively organizing and mobilizing the most powerful grassroots citizen action network in America, a grassroots network committed to informed and coordinated civic action that will lead to public policies that promote America’s national security and the defense of American democratic values against the assault of radical Islam. We are only as strong as our supporters, and your volunteer and financial support is essential to our success. Thank you for helping us make America safer and more secure. HOW CAN I TELL OTHERS ABOUT YOUR ORGANIZATION? Send a personalized version of this message to your friends. HOW CAN I SUPPORT YOUR ORGANIZATION? Click here to give an online donation. |
What makes America great is this; When Christianity goes astray, predominantly Christians in a democracy correct that church, that faith. This is not the case in Islam in a theocracy. It is up to predominantly Christians from democracies that correct Islamic, or Nazi, or Communist, or Christian or whatever banner evil pops its head up from under. This is why America is great, this is why we honor Israel, Australia, and the U.K. and whoever chips into the fight against evil. These are countries who self correct their own evils and face the threats evil perpetrates on others. Imperialism charges against these free countries is not only false, it is astoundingly ignorant of history, even recent history to equate honorable people, nations, and religions with those who wreak havoc on the rest of the world. It is profoundly arrogant and hypocritical for half of the free world to condemn these nations for our actions with military force to bring peace to their own regions and to answer attacks on their nations with overwhelming force. The moral compass of anyone who equates our actions with those of people who attack innocent citizens using 14 year old children to carry bomb belts into our midst and blow themselves up in the hope of killing as many innocents as possible, has to be 180* out or missing altogether. To compare Abu Graib or Guantanamo to people who saw off heads, who use piano wire to slice off the faces of children, to excuse any action on the basis of the desperation of the enemy is to lack reason and common sense.
Dispatches is an English version of a video news magazine similar to 20/20. These videos are one complete program revealing what is taught in many Muslim Mosques. It is well worth watching all six of these videos. As you watch them, keep in mind that the same funding and source of promotional material is being sent around the world, including to the mosques in the United States. The same brand of Islam is paid for and promoted by the same people who are supporting these mosques in England. No under cover operation has come to light on the U.S. mosques but they are sourced the same as those in England and around the world. I cannot re-iterate this enough. This is what is being taught inside mosques right here in the United States today.
Now bear with me here, I'm not done. Here in our own culture we have another religion going under the banner of Christianity who is preaching separation, racism, genocide, and believing America is the worst influence on the world. So, are all religions to blame for all the strife and wars around the world?
The attacks of these pathetically weak nutcases in the deserts will not remain pathetic forever. They are acquiring technology with the money we spend on their oil and then pronounce publicly their intentions to wipe Israel off the map even if it means their own country's destruction. I believe Ahmadenijad when he says such things. I see it in the actions of others with fewer resources than he has. I believe them when they say they intend to rule the world by terrorizing us into submission. They laugh at the idea that some of you excuse their behavior and chalk it up to their economic status. I am appalled at your world view when you continue such nonsense in the face of the evidence. Doctors who suicide in England and college graduates who perpetrated the attacks on 11 September 2001. There is no excuse for your behavior in the face of such threats to our culture, our security, and our homelands.
We must clear this theocracy from our midst. We must cleanse our own culture of this evil influence. We must encourage our government to investigate their theocratic institutions to retain our method of governance, law, and freedom. Theirs is not just a religion, this is not just a belief system, this is a societal, cultural, national threat in the form of a flawed theocracy and it is being fostered from within our midst. Every teaching that promotes violent overthrow should be destroyed, every one that teaches this violent overthrow of our governing system must be destroyed or incarcerated. Every teaching that advocates, supports, or encourages murderous behavior should be destroyed and its teacher incarcerated or destroyed. Every teaching that encourages separatism and inculcation of children to die in the attempt to kill an unbeliever must be destroyed and its teacher incarcerated or destroyed. There is no room in our free society for this theocracy. And there is little time to come to this conclusion and begin to take action. Every country that seeks technology which could be used in this theocratic endeavor must be stopped with overwhelming force. If need be, we must invade and build nations into democracies to prevent this evil threat from arising to once again threaten free cultures with terror and destruction with increasingly available technologies. In the name of freedom of speech, freedom of religion and no religion, in the name of leadership accountability, we must take action with overwhelming force to ensure our continued existence because their is no other force in the world capable of meeting this threat. There may not even be any other people with the will to take on this fight. This is not a couple of skirmishes with subversive powers, get used to the idea of confrontation because it is going to be around for a long time. Actually it has been going on for centuries, but now we are funding them with our appetite for oil and they are acquiring momentum and technology to make it big enough to become WWIII.
I love YouTube. Would you really be able to gain an insight to another culture without international video sharing? I mean, really......
Compare that to the tiny little Island off the coast of Florida (Cuba) where they are just now able to buy cell phones and computers. Even with these toy/tools they do not have the freedom to say what the want or go where they want or even live how they want. There are heavy restrictions on approximately half the world's population because of their governments or radical elements within their cultures and they are threatened with incarceration or death for violations against their oppressive rule. Even in free countries, as depicted in the video above, there are real reasons to complain but on the whole, we are a blessed people on the earth. This does not even take into account the blessings God has bestowed on the earth so that we may thrive. Plenty of water and air and food. Plenty of materials available to work with to create goods we use and value. Plenty of intelligence to learn how to use those materials and shape them into those usable products.
On the whole, we have much more reason to praise God than to complain to Him. I personally glad to have been trained in how to balance my complaining with a lot of gratitude. It has both, made me a better person, and a happier person.
In Christendom we have a saying. Know Jesus, know peace..... no Jesus, no peace. Radical Islam is, and always has proven just the opposite for its faith. This study is historically and empirically supported. When
politically correct and culturally diverse societies agree to "the
reasonable" Muslim demands for their "religious rights," they also get
the other components under the table. Here's how it works (percentages
source CIA: The World Fact Book (2007)). As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given
country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a
threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films,
stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness: At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities
and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among
street gangs: From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic
standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims.
They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on
their shelves -- along with threats for failure to comply. (United
States). At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow
them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate
goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law
over the entire world. When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase
lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions (Paris --
car-burnings). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in
uprisings and threats (Amsterdam -- Mohammed cartoons). After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning: At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare: From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and
other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia
Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels: After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide: 100% will usher in the peace of "Dar-es-Salaam" -- the Islamic House
of Peace -- there's supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim: Of course, that's not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons. "Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It
was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my
family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and
the tribe against the world and all of us against the infidel. -- Leon
Uris, "The Haj" It is good to remember that in many, many countries, such as France,
the Muslim populations are centered around ghettos based on their
ethnicity. Muslims do not integrate into the community at large.
Therefore, they exercise more power than their national average would
indicate. Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond's book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat.. www.frontline.org.za/books_videos/sti.htm
Australia -- Muslim 1.5%
Canada -- Muslim 1.9%
China -- Muslim 1%-2%
Italy -- Muslim 1.5%
Norway -- Muslim 1.8%
Germany -- Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom -- Muslim 2.7%
Spain -- Muslim 4%
Thailand -- Muslim 4.6%
Philippines -- Muslim 5%
Sweden -- Muslim 5%
Switzerland -- Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands -- Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago -- Muslim 5.8%
India -- Muslim 13.4%
Israel -- Muslim 16%
Kenya -- Muslim 10%
Russia -- Muslim 10-15%
Chad -- Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon -- Muslim 59.7%
Malaysia -- Muslim 60.4%
Qatar -- Muslim 77.5%
Sudan -- Muslim 70%
Egypt -- Muslim 90%
Gaza -- Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia -- Muslim 86.1%
Iran -- Muslim 98%
Iraq -- Muslim 97%
Jordan -- Muslim 92%
Morocco -- Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan -- Muslim 97%
Palestine -- Muslim 99%
Syria -- Muslim 90%
Tajikistan -- Muslim 90%
Turkey -- Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates -- Muslim 96%
Saudi Arabia -- Muslim 100%
Somalia -- Muslim 100%
Yemen -- Muslim 99.9%
What the Western world finds when it invades Muslim controlled lands is a demonstration in anti-socialism on a grand scale. Afghanistan was divided clan by clan and in constant conflict. Iraq was undergoing ethnic cleansing of one brand of Islam against another brand. This is the Islam that was found by the British, French, and Spanish invaders in the last two centuries. This is why the West could invade at all, and even if Islam could manage to mobilize its entire 1.3 billion population around the globe to enforce conversion or death, it would merely return to its old ways of intra-Muslim killing. The evidence in history shows, unless Muslims stand up against their extremist
faction, they will incur the wrath of the Western world or they will face a world of never ending conflict, faction against faction, clan against clan, village against village.
It is a shame on Islam that the house of war knows more peace than the house of peace where Muslim upon Muslim violence claims more Muslim lives and stifles economic success than all the Crusades and the military actions of the last century in Muslim lands, combined. You are following liars, your media and your scholars and your clerics are propagating a massive conspiracy of hatred and blame on the West for the evils perpetrated on your people by your people. Break the stranglehold of fundamentalism and Sharia and call into accountability your leaders and informers. Some of you have access to the same information I do, and it is your responsibility to make the truth known to your people just as it is mine to my people.
These facts are opening the eyes of the peace activists and moderate factions in the West and their hatred and prejudice currently set squarely on the religions of the West will be redirected toward Islam and will be far greater than the so called 'crusaders' at work in Muslim majority lands today. Lies from Western and Eastern political leaders, Islamic religious leaders, news agencies, and embedded Muslim scholars in our institutions of higher learning are being revealed with the advent of the internet where people can now have information within minutes of events. The more 'in the news' violent Islam makes itself in current events, the more the public educates itself in the history of Islam and begin to shout down the ignorance of our so called tolerant and their sources of false information.
These revelations
source anger and hatred toward beneficiaries of the lies which cause great personal and financial cost to the
formerly ignorant West. Brothers, fathers, and sons are dying needlessly, economic
malaise for tax dollars and corporate profit results in funded Muslim
aggression toward the rest of the world needlessly. The end result
will be a world wide movement to eradicate Islam and in that day, the
farce of the 'house of peace' will pop and the resonance will be heard
till the end of time just as the farce of Hitler's super race resounds to this day.
One of the most famous quotes of all time is Mahatma Gandhi's
statement that "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind." It is
so popular among the cultural left in this country that you can see it
on bumper stickers from sea to shining sea. Goes right along with the footprint of the American chicken.
I suggest that tolerance of remorseless evil also makes the whole world blind. The secularists tolerate by equating the evil with the good,
the violent forcing a foreign will on the innocent with those who
violently resist such forces. Now the peace movement has moved into
their own intolerance of the defenders of free will. The liberal
Berkeley city council story for example or the more recent bombing of
the NY recruiting office. The secularists are statist in that they use
the force of big government to take from the successful workforce under
threat of incarceration to give to the unsuccessful and the lazy.
They're called taxes and they're raising them so they can give them
away in the form of unemployment insurance, welfare, scholarships,
grants, or they're spent on earmarks like diversity training/tolerance
indoctrination and the now infamous bridge to nowhere, not to mention
what the politicians keep for themselves. This is not love even though
it gives them warm fuzzy feelings that they are doing something for the
unemployed, the alcoholics, the drug addicts, the fatherless gang
members, etc., On the right, the Christian conservatives prefer to have
the choice of giving to which organization is successful at meeting
those needs in the best possible way.
Balancing judgment and mercy is no tight rope walk. There are miles between the two extremes and righteousness is found in the right mixture of the two to turn a self destructive man from his ways. The only requirement for righteous judgment is love for your fellow man. Love is not always sweetness and warm fuzzy feelings. Sometimes love is hard and rigid. When I was mean to my little brother as a kid, my dad spanked me and taught me to equate his suffering with my own, to empathize the pain I'd caused him. That was love for both me and my little brother. The secularists want a spankless world where people are treated (doctored) out of their 'harmful to others' and prejudiced a.k.a. 'intolerant' ways.
If I am caught breaking a law, even if it is a law of moral values and not written into any penal code, it is loving for a fellow man to confront me on the basis of my own beliefs. To allow me to continue in my self destructive behavior is not tolerant, rather it is hateful. It is damaging to the general community to tolerate people following any desire. This is why Christians say the secularists have turned truth upside down. Secularists claim intolerance is hateful. "If people want to do drugs, make sure they do it in a safe environment. If they want to live a homosexual lifestyle and call it marriage, let them get married." Until we knew that drugs were addictive when used recreationally, the secularists were all on board with legalizing recreational drug use. Many users still are but the rest recognized the damage to society after the 1970's. Crime rates skyrocketed and the users wind up screwing up their entire families' lives as well as every relationship they ever had and themselves dying if allowed to continue.
Now with gay marriage, the secularists can't see past the nose on their face, what damage this will do to society. They can't even admit that this behavior is dangerous to the participants. The human body's organs and valves and so on, have specific functions. The anus is a one way valve. Bodily fluids exchanged in sexual encounters entails some risk of transmitting diseases, risks made much greater when done in ways we aren't designed to do. Actual physical harm is often done in these practices as well. Let's just say it doesn't wear well when used in impractical ways. Don't believe me, check this out. Lot's of other disorders associated with 'the lifestyle.' The only reason they are blind to these issues is because they are covering their own eyes. Their only motivation for covering their own eyes is to refuse to look at the reality of consequence to their own desires.
When it comes to spanking a nation or an ideology, it takes wars. Sanctions are like timeouts, or losing a privilege. International corporal punishment comes in the form of military action. That's what happened in Afghanistan and Iraq. That's not hatred. Hatred was the Clinton administration ignoring the growing problems in Iraq and Afghanistan, ignoring the looming threats against us, ignoring the plight of their people.
Here we are again, seeing the new evidence of how low they will go to inflict their evil on the rest of us. This video explains how the terrorists are using prosthetics to disguise their suicide bombers as pregnant women. It goes on to reveal that they are recruiting people who look and sound like westerners and have the legitimate documentation to travel freely, to carry out their attacks on innocent civilians.
Original site can be found at:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=9a4_1202868059
Profiling won't be an issue anymore, but accidental shootings of pregnant women within our airports and sports arenas may be. Lest we forget, they have already arranged it so that its now possible to mistakenly kill the mentally challenged and children by using them to carry out terrorist bombings.
We westerners have to understand that their's is a culture that values religious pride and identity above life, even the lives of their own children as evidenced not only by these unwitting suicide bombers, but also by their honor killings of daughters who refuse to wear the hijab or who've been raped or for just dating.
America does not target innocent civilians but the enemy uses the innocent as shields and as couriers to carry their bomb belts into our midst. The enemy is evil, real, and cunning. Their is no comparison between honorable men and women of our culture and those who consider it an honor to target our innocent and hide behind their innocent civilians. Cowardly tactics from cowardly ideologues.
About those who compare ours to theirs; you consider it bravery to attack honorable institutions and those who man them on the confidence that you will not be answered violence for violence. Beware; this is an open threat. If I catch any of you attacking one of these honorable people who cannot return blow for blow under threat of biased prosecutor and judges and this politically correct climate, I will step up to do so in their stead. Your right to freedom of speech does not include destruction of property public or private, and it certainly does not include any personal attacks to people in uniform.
